Why the FCC must get with the times, at last

Signal Corps Hello Girls

We do not make telephone calls the way in which we did a century ago. Rules wish to get with the times, too.

We’re in the middle of a transition faraway from copper wire-based totally communications services and products to broadband internet-based totally services and products — a transition that then-FCC commissioner Michael Powell referred to as the “nice Digital Broadband Migration” means again within the 12 months 2000.

To its credit, on October 23, the home vitality and Commerce Committee held a listening to on the implications of this migration to digital products and services. While the listening top’s title — “The Evolution of Wired Communications Networks” — may put you in thoughts for an excellent nap, the listening to did center of attention wanted attention on vital public policy issues raised by the digital transition. And now, with the Senate just confirming Democrat Tom Wheeler as President Osama’s choice for brand spanking new Federal Communications commission chairman, together with Republican Michael O’Reilly as a new commissioner, the house listening to couldn’t had been timelier.

Since the FCC, with a new chairman and a full complement of commissioners now on board, must act with dispatch to adapt its regulations to the brand new digital age market realities.

 

 

Related More Articles : 

The digital migration, or migration to IP (internet Protocol) services and products as they’re ceaselessly known as, already is a long way along. in keeping with a just-released record via Anna-Maria Kovacs, a visiting senior coverage pupil at Georgetown college’s center for business and Public policy, as of 2012 only 5 p.c of U.S. households still rely best on copper-primarily based wire line POTS (plain old phone provider) lines for voice communications, whereas 38 p.c of U.S. households are Wi-Fi best. Over ninety % of households subscribe to Wi-Fi provider, increasingly more delivered over IP broadband systems. The entire whereas, the number of subscribers to IP-based voice products and services provided via cable firms and others has elevated incessantly as POTS subscriptions have declined.

The IP migration gifts policymakers with an elementary query: will the century-previous public utility-fashion regulatory framework that still mostly governs communications carrier providers be replaced through a free market-oriented framework that benefits consumers, whereas, at the same time, stimulating funding and innovation? Or as a substitute, will the legacy framework, with price law, nondiscrimination mandates, and other regulatory strictures, be an obstacle to realizing the full benefits of the digital revolution?

there may be close to common agreement that IP products and services present shoppers with more features and functionalities in less costly, extra environment friendly ways than do the previous copper-based totally services. there may be additionally well-liked settlement that IP-based totally products and services have fostered increasing competitors amongst broadband suppliers for the supply of voice, high-speed data, and video services and products, in spite of whether or not these suppliers offer these services and products over wire line, cable, wireless, satellite TV for pc, fiber, or any other know-how.

So the related level for the FCC and other policymakers isn’t, as pro-regulatory advocates frequently indicate, that the entire products and services provided by all of the competitors should not completely substitutable all of the time for all customers. No, the relevant point is that, for a big, ever growing collection of customers, a choice of various IP-primarily based rivals exists, and these opponents, in flip, supply a selection of attractive provider options.

In different words, inside the past decade or two, the communications marketplace has been reworked from a monopolistic setting right into a competitive one characterized by increasing consumer option.

 

Author: Rohit Shetty

Share This Post On